Top Ten Videos to watch

A Man Operating A Tv Camera
Maurice White
'News One Now' With Roland Martin Taping
Bill Cosby
Activists In Los Angeles Gather To Burn Likenesses Of The Confederate Flag
Flint Firebirds V Windsor Spitfires
CBC Message To America: Rep. Conyers Addresses The Damage Inflicted On Our Communities By Poverty, Mass Incarceration And Lack Of Economic Development
Iowa Caucus Ted Cruz
NewsOne Now NAACP Image Awards Preview
Student sitting at a desk in a classroom
Slavery Stock image
The 16th Annual Wall Street Project Gala Fundraising Reception
Ava DuVernay
Roland Martin Blasts Stacey Dash For Comments About BET, Black Networks
President Obama Delivers State Of The Union Address At U.S. Capitol
Ava DuVernay
2016 North American International Auto Show
Democratic National Committee Presidential Primary Debate
88th Oscars Nominations Announcement
Democratic debate
Dream Speech
GOP Presidential Candidates Debate In Charleston
US President Barack Obama speaks on the
2011 Winter TCA Tour - Day 5
LOS ANGELES, CA - FEBRUARY 18, 2015: Two wooden stand-in Oscar statuettes are ready to be taken on
Woman Holding Dollars - Isolated
President Barack Obama Delivers His State Of The Union Address
Leave a comment

Anyone reading this understands the power of words.  Words allow us to share vital information, create new ideas and perhaps most strikingly, influence our thought process.  Words after all have consequences.  So when the folks at Cadbury decided to compare super model Naomi Campbell to a chocolate bar in their latest ad, what exactly were they saying?  And is the supermodel right to be offended?  You be the judge.

As a woman of color, I’m very cognizant about the way in which we address ourselves, the way African Americans refer to each other and of course the way others refer to us.  Naomi Campbell is rightfully troubled by the perplexing actions of Cadbury even implying – let alone openly stating – that she is “chocolate” anything.  It’s yet another example of corporate insensitivity towards minorities and proof that advertising rooms are still largely devoid of diversity.

The conversation surrounding race and terminology didn’t of course begin with Naomi Campbell and Cadbury.  A few years back, National Action Network, under the leadership of Rev. Al Sharpton, created the Decency Initiative aimed at combating the rampant usage of inflammatory language.  But even as many continue to regularly use words like “ho,” “bitch” and “ni@#a” to address one another, when has it ever been okay for someone else to call us by such names?

Let’s even take it back to childhood.  Growing up, many of us had nicknames and pet names given to us by our mothers, but would we ever let a non-family member call us by such a name?  On the hit MTV show, “Jersey Shore,” we often see cast members call each other “guidos” or even “guidettes,” but would any of them ever tolerate a non-Italian referring to them as such?  I think not.

As we continue to sort out the indecency of Cadbury’s not-so-subtle reference to Naomi Campbell, will we as African Americans continue to call each other “chocolate?”  Will we denounce the use of the word “ni@#a” or will we just make sure no one else uses it?  Will advertising execs start to think of the imagery that their words create and the impact of their actions?  Or will we continue to live in a world where we are so removed from those different from us that we don’t even know what’s appropriate to say?

Let’s hope it’s not the latter.


Naomi Campbell Sues Cadbury Over “Racist” Chocolate Ads

Can Naomi Campbell Fight Cadbury And Become A Model Warrior

Also On News One: