Top Ten Videos to watch

HISTORY Brings 'Roots' Cast And Crew To The White House For Screening
Graduates tossing caps into the air
Freddie Gray Baltimore Protests
Mid section of man in graduation gown holding diploma
Legendary Baseball Player Tony Gwynn's Family Files A Lawsuit Against Big Tobacco
ME.jailhouse#2.0117.CW Montebello City Council has approved use of a private contractor to run the n
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel Addresses Police Misconduct At Chicago City Council Meeting
WWII Soldiers Standing In A Flag Draped Sunset - SIlhouette
Students Taking a College Exam
Bill Cosby Preliminary Hearing
Hillary Clinton Campaigns In Louisville, Kentucky
Worried black businesswoman at desk
Tyler Perry And Soledad O'Brien Host Gala Honoring Bishop T.D. Jakes' 35 Years Of Ministry
Teacher with group of preschoolers sitting at table
FBI Officials Discuss Apprehension Of Explosions Suspect After Three-Day Manhunt
NFC Championship - San Francisco 49ers v Atlanta Falcons
Protests Erupt In Chicago After Video Of Police Shooting Of Teen Is Released
Nine Dead After Church Shooting In Charleston
Portrait of senior African woman holding money
President Bush Speals At Federalist Society's Gala
Police Line Tape
Senior Woman's Hands
Police officers running
New Orleans Residents Return to Housing Projects
David Banner
Leave a comment

Anyone reading this understands the power of words.  Words allow us to share vital information, create new ideas and perhaps most strikingly, influence our thought process.  Words after all have consequences.  So when the folks at Cadbury decided to compare super model Naomi Campbell to a chocolate bar in their latest ad, what exactly were they saying?  And is the supermodel right to be offended?  You be the judge.

As a woman of color, I’m very cognizant about the way in which we address ourselves, the way African Americans refer to each other and of course the way others refer to us.  Naomi Campbell is rightfully troubled by the perplexing actions of Cadbury even implying – let alone openly stating – that she is “chocolate” anything.  It’s yet another example of corporate insensitivity towards minorities and proof that advertising rooms are still largely devoid of diversity.

The conversation surrounding race and terminology didn’t of course begin with Naomi Campbell and Cadbury.  A few years back, National Action Network, under the leadership of Rev. Al Sharpton, created the Decency Initiative aimed at combating the rampant usage of inflammatory language.  But even as many continue to regularly use words like “ho,” “bitch” and “ni@#a” to address one another, when has it ever been okay for someone else to call us by such names?

Let’s even take it back to childhood.  Growing up, many of us had nicknames and pet names given to us by our mothers, but would we ever let a non-family member call us by such a name?  On the hit MTV show, “Jersey Shore,” we often see cast members call each other “guidos” or even “guidettes,” but would any of them ever tolerate a non-Italian referring to them as such?  I think not.

As we continue to sort out the indecency of Cadbury’s not-so-subtle reference to Naomi Campbell, will we as African Americans continue to call each other “chocolate?”  Will we denounce the use of the word “ni@#a” or will we just make sure no one else uses it?  Will advertising execs start to think of the imagery that their words create and the impact of their actions?  Or will we continue to live in a world where we are so removed from those different from us that we don’t even know what’s appropriate to say?

Let’s hope it’s not the latter.


Naomi Campbell Sues Cadbury Over “Racist” Chocolate Ads

Can Naomi Campbell Fight Cadbury And Become A Model Warrior

Also On News One: