Send Feedback

GR_PR_090807whispers-RonPaulBETTER

Rand Paul has never held political office and has no record to stand on, yet he is running for Senator of Kentucky. The main drawing point to Rand Paul is not himself, but his father’s name and the Tea Party movement. In an interview with Alan Colmes, Ron Paul admitted that there are no major differences in the political philosophies of  himself and his son.

Both Ron and his son opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, for forcing private businesses to integrate. They will claim that it is for “libertarian” reasons. But if you look deeper into the Ron Paul “Revolution,” you will see that it is just as connected to white supremacist movements as libertarian ones. Ron Paul is not your traditional ideological Libertarian. His brand of Libertarianism is rooted in the John Birch Society and the Ludwig Von Mises Institute. Both of these institutions try and hide their racism, while promoting racist policies.

You would think that Republican philosophies on race would have changed in 50 years. Still, Rand and Ron’s philosophy on Civil Rights is no different than Barry Goldwater’s, who ran for President in 1964 with the support of the John Birch Society and racist whites in the South who wanted to continue segregation. The website PublicEye.org, writes:

The JBS simultaneously discouraged overt displays of racism, while it promoted policies that had the effect of racist oppression by its opposition to the Civil Rights movement.

While The John Birch Society may have claimed not to be racist, their support for racist policies, has led them to be a magnet for white supremacists.

The Society’s anti-communism and states rights libertarianism was based on sincere principles, but it clearly served as a cover for organizing by segregationists and White supremacists. How much of this was conscious, and how much unconscious, is difficult to determine. That the Birch Society clearly attracted members with a more hate-filled (even fascistic) agenda is undeniable, and these more zealous elements used the JBS as a recruitment pool from which to draw persons toward a more neonazi stance on issues of race and culture.

Despite its nefarious history, Ron Paul has been a longtime supporter and friend of the John Birch Society, speaking as they keynote speaker at their 50th anniversary and holding  rallies with them. Like The John Birch society, Paul has become a magnet for Neo-Nazis who support him online on sites like Stormfront. Paul even has a picture with the Internets most notorious Neo-Nazis, Don Black and his son Derrek, the founders of Stormfront. Paul also famously refused to give back a donation from Don Black.

I’d be interested in hearing if Rand Paul agrees with his father that the Civil War shouldn’t have been fought and that the north was wrong for invading the South. Another seemingly racist position, that Ron Paul defends with libertarian “states rights” ideologies.

What Ron Paul and Rand Paul do is provide an intellectual cover and defense for blatant racism. This, along with Ron Paul’s history of promoting racism through his newsletters, is why they receive so much support from white supremacists. The two driving forces for the Paul’s political philosophy, the Ludwig Von Mises Institute and the John Birch society both serve as intellectual fronts for racism. The Ludwig Von Mises society is labeled a Neo-Confederate organization by the Southern Poverty Law Center for its support of the South in the Civil War and criticisms of Abraham Lincoln and the John Birch society is famous for producing people who go on to be Neo-Nazi leaders such as Revilo P. Oliver, Tom Metzger, William Pierce, and Kevin Strom.

In his newsletters, Ron Paul would often praise white supremacist leader David Duke. It appears that Ron learned a lot from Duke’s failed run at governor of Louisiana in 1991, in which he was defeated yet received a good deal of media attention. In 1991, Ron Paul wrote:

“Is David Duke’s new prominence, despite his losing the gubernatorial election, good for anti-big government forces? our priority should be to take the anti-government, anti-tax, anti-crime, anti-welfare loafers, anti-race privilege, anti-foreign meddling message of Duke, and enclose it in a more consistent package of freedom.”

Ron Paul has backed away from the racism of his newsletters but still holds on to his racist positions on the Civil Rights Act, the Civil War and hate crime legislation on “libertarian grounds.” Paul has in essence become David Duke without the Klan hood, holding the same positions while toning down the racist rhetoric.

Given that Rand has done nothing to distance himself from his father’s views, and has no other legs to stand on than his father’s name, one can assume that Rand holds the same views. Given Ron Paul’s racist newsletters and his connections to the John Birch Society and the Ludwig Von Mises institute,  it is no coincidence that his “libertarian” positions also happen to be racist. Either the Pauls come from the white supremacist wing of the Libertarian movement, or the Libertarian wing of the white supremacist movement.

RELATED STORIES

OPINION: Rand Paul Is A Conspiracy Theorist Lunatic

OPINION: Rand Paul, Like Father Like Racist Son

OPINION: Ron Paul And Glenn Beck Promote White Right Wing Terrorism

Ron Paul’s Racist Newsletters Revealed

OPINION: Ron Paul Is A White Supremacist

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Tags: Neo-Nazis, Racism, Rand Paul, Ron Paul, White supremacy
Recommend to friends!
  • BlackPlanet
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email

News One Links

 
  • http://www.blackplanet.com/CaliFemme23/ CaliFemme23

    oooooo, now those highly intelligent white folks are hiding the racism in politics! Just how does one ‘hide’ racism anyway? I dont think white folks make it a point to hide anything when it comes to supremacy…

    Casey you must have gotten your degree from a box of Crackerjacks…
    Columbia must have graduated you because they were tired of you…
    OR they felt sorry for you…

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/malikk103/ malikk103

    will you people please stop pimping all this black liberation theology crap its really getting old

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/CaliFemme23/ CaliFemme23

    LMAO!! Come on Supertongue, You’re deleting me too??!!

    ROTF!

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/RaferJanders/ RaferJanders

    Don’t you hate being wrong? Come Casey your spin on things is hysterical!
    Lies, without a single shred of proof, Laughable!

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/phazex_female/ phazex_female

    You’re not telling me nothing that I do not already know about these clowns or that racist John Birch Society. I recall this society soliciting me ONCE for a sizable donation. Let me just say they have not attempted since after what I told them…smh…lol!

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/Frenzy_Hunter/ Frenzy_Hunter

    I believe in libertarian/ Ayn Rand objectivist principles. Does that make me a racist against people of color simply because I believe in individual freedom and responsibility?

    Get the f#ck outta here, Casey.

    You know that most people you’re speaking to on these forums are uneducated or under-educated about these matters. You only spew this crap to get clicks for advertising dollars. And you know many will never recognize that.

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/xtopher7/ xtopher7

    It’s amazing that a writer, editor, rapper, producer and actor and especially a Columbia University Graduate, previously working in the non-profit sector doesn’t have the common sense to know the difference between RACISM and BIGOTRY— and even more Ridiculous, doesn’t understand the REAL PROBLEM is ELITISM—

    There is no racism in AMERICA any more…
    It is all vast arrays of ELITISM— even you would have an opinion about raising a family in a third world country— otherwise— you would move there? RIGHT?

    Does the Minority trying to leave the TRAILER PARK, THE GHETTO, THE INNER CITY by going to college become labeled a RACIST? Perhaps because they are intolerant of their surroundings, their neighbors acceptance of status quo, the lack of self respect and respect for others?

    We are ELITIST in the sense that it spurs us to desire better for our progeny—to raise the bar for our children’s children so that they will grow up in better conditions that we did… This ELITISM is defined by INTOLERANCE—

    And INTOLERANCE is something not one of us can look into a mirror and say— I am not GUILTY of this!
    I guarantee the PAULS do not disavow RACISM to cover up a lie… and GUESS what—I have a picture with RON PAUL as well…. Doesn’t mean he associates with my opinion, or ideology, but it does mean he will support anyone who is in favor of freedom… ESPECIALLY A BLACK MAN WHO SHOULD APPRECIATE IT BECAUSE HE NEEDS IT MOST!
    Stop feeding at the trough— and get informed… then make a college educated opinion— you mouth piece

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/xtopher7/ xtopher7

    IN Caseys defence…. he is merely spewing what he has been indoctrinated with… He is a droid… Its what most Universities push through their doors now.. FREE THINKERS look beyond blaming others for there plight in life…

    I am a coolege graduate straight out of a TEXAS TRAILER PARK– and its up to singular humans to suck it up and make the decision… ” AINT NO LUCK– BUT WHAT WE MAKE!”

  • Casey Gane-McCalla

    I love how everybody who has a different opinion than doctor Paul’s is uneducated or ignorant…

    all that wonderful Libertarian freedom liberty constitution is just bs lets let companies dump oil in our water and not let black people eat at their lunch counter..its the libertarian way

    you guys are the misinformed ones i have over 17 links of proof

    who am i mouthpiece for? i know in your world anyone who opposes the Pauls are part of a secret illuminati bilderberg group who hangs out with Zignew Brzenski at the Bohemian grove plotting ways to make supertunnels and sell Ameros to start the New World Order and get all you freedom loving patriots into FEMA concentration camps with our Black helicopters but I haven’t been CCd on the memo

    as for elitism what kind of regular guy has his election party at an exclusive golf club? is that not elitist..The whole Ron Paul free market philosphy is just another way to keep the rich rich and the poor poorer

    keep on coming Paultards not one point i’ve made has been challenged just because everybody doesn’t want to bomb the Fed and join the white supremacist Ron Paul revolution does not mean we’re uneducated or uniformed..maybe your just too brainwashed to see their racism

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/lakerdude19/ lakerdude19

    Casey, thanks for the original article. I appreciate your ability to avoid repeating yourself from past articles over the exact same topics (please note the obvious sarcasm).

    “Paultards, racists, conspiracy theorists.” You’re resorting to name-calling… that just shows that you have no more ammo. So keep on calling me “the most hated white racist on BP”, and please continue to refer to Ron Paul fans as “paultards,” because it fits perfectly into your juvenile sentiments.

    So grow up, and let _A_ post so we can sit back and watch you get defloured by legitimacy.

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/Infamous0ne/ Infamous0ne

    To be honest, I think a site dedicated to news for Blacks is racist. A television station for blacks is racist (BET). A caucus of all blacks in congress is racist. An organization that works towards black interests is racist (NAACP).

    Libertarians believe in individuals. We arent against things like affirmative action because we are racist, we are against them because descrimination is wrong no matter who is the target. Rand Paul doesnt see people in groups, he sees them as individuals. People like the ones who read this site see everything through the prism of groups, aka race.

    YOU are the real racists.

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/CaliFemme23/ CaliFemme23

    lakerdude19, “So grow up, and let _A_ post so we can sit back and watch you get defloured by legitimacy.”

    LOL…Never thought I would read this from you…good sh!t..

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/RaferJanders/ RaferJanders

    Casey? So you banned _A_? I get it if a brother is smarter than you and nails you every time, You remove him from the board. I get it man, Don’t want your loyal readers seeing you for what you are! Keep charging those Windmills Don Casey, funny really funny! Pauls are not Racists, Your the only Racist I see!

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/RaferJanders/ RaferJanders

    93% thumbs down 7% thumbs up…. Hmmmmm Polls lie right? That 7% is that your family casey? Look another Windmill, Charge!

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/AlgCutDog/ AlgCutDog

    IMO the provisions in the CRA that FORCED private businesses set the precedent for the government to destroy individual liberty and property. No one should be forced to associate with anyone, period. Those businesses that would have continued to discriminate would eventually have went out of business and would have been …shamed out of society. The govt can not solve social ills. Why would u want to give your money to a business that hates you? If walmart came out tomorrow and said it doesn’t want to serve blacks would u still shop there? Of course not. Black people carry a 1 trillion dollar a year purchasing power.. We would be able to bring that to companies that want our business. Also, I know plenty of whites that would boycott a business if it had racist policies. I think we should have focused on building our economic base rather than growing racist white business owners….They benefited the most from CRA. Now as far as desegregating government institution, yes….the government should not be viewing race ,period. You article is a bunch of horse sh!t (as usual) and Im hope you dont think you speak for all black people.

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/FisherofMen/ FisherofMen

    The name of your website is “NewsOne For BLACK America,” but you’re getting on Ron and Rand Paul for being supposed racists? I wonder how you would like a website explicitly named “NewsOne For White America.” Take the beam out of your own eye before casting out the mote in your neighbor’s (Matthew 7:2-5).

    In any case, it’s obvious you don’t understand either of their political philosophies about the jurisdictional reach of government. As a Black supporter of Ron and Rand Paul, I totally agree with their views on the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Though racial discrimination is immoral, it should not be the federal government’s responsibility to change those behaviors, specifically in private affairs. People on the local levels, whether it be individuals, families, churches or the marketplace, should hold private business owners accountable for their racist attitudes.

    Our federal government can’t even follow a simple piece of paper, nor can they balance a checkbook. So how can they even have the audacity to tell local people how they ought to treat people on their private property? Their hypocrisy, like yours, knows no bounds.

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/Private_Gripweed/ Private_Gripweed

    I believe that the Paul men are being persecuted NOT for their views on race but something far more sinister. As a main part of their libertarian platform, they have publicly vowed to audit and eventually end the ponzi scheme known as the Federal Reserve Bank. The Fed is keeping people of all colors as their ECONOMIC slaves!! The minute we stop fighting amongst ourselves and unite to expose this common enemy to our nation and our world is the minute we win prosperity for ourselves and our children. Shout it to rooftops END THE FED!!!

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/Seantzizl/ Seantzizl

    I think its wrong for a business to turn somebody down based on the color of their skin. But i also think its impossible to legislate morality. That clause in the civil rights act had a lot of blow back. It didn’t make the country less racist. It was also unconstitutional (not that our government cares).

    I also don’t think we would need it today. The best thing that came from the civil rights movement was not legislation, it was a change in ideas. I highly doubt in this day and age that any business with signs saying “whites only”, would last too long.

    But hey, by your standards I’m a racist too. So be it – I grew up thinking being a racist meant thinking you should judge and look down upon others based on the color their skin. The definition seems to have to changed. Now being racist means being white and not being willing to forcibly impose my non-racial-prejudice views onto others. So f**k it’ i guess i’m a racist.

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/duane-g/ duane-g

    Fisher of Men, you wrote: The name of your website is “NewsOne For BLACK America,” but you’re getting on Ron and Rand Paul for being supposed racists? I wonder how you would like a website explicitly named “NewsOne For White America.”

    Why don’t you go to stormfront.org and blog?!?! I think you might be more comfortable over there.

    And since you touched on it (and according to quite a few blogs below), maybe the name does need to change to “NEWSONE FOR ANGRY WHITE DUDES”.

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/mr_rightnowww/ mr_rightnowww

    they’re not hiding it very well. who cant see that those two ‘woods are racist?

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/BlackTerrel/ BlackTerrel

    Where’s the NAAWP- National Association for the Advancement of White People? Or the United Hispanic College Fund, Or the Suburan League, Or Asian Only Colleges, oh, excuse me, Asian Historic Colleges.

    Casey Gane-McCalla, right in front of our faces we are seeing the racist bias “For Blacks Only” organizations, foundations, curriculums, institutions, etc, which is every bit as racist as the most fanatical extremist groups.

    The last thing I wish for is a hand-out, or entitlement that classifies me to privileges because of; Race, Creed, Color, Persuasion, and so for. When I was in the military, everyone is treated the same, equal. I for one don’t want any quotas or affirmative action for me to have special privileges to succeed or exceed. I think it’s outright disgusting that one race has exception over all others.

    Casey Gane-McCalla you are as much of a racist as any other one-sided, chip on your shoulder, and/or grudge carrying propagandists. Here’s the skinny, knock off the racist oppression nonsense or go back 200 years to live your life, but don’t drag the rest of us into your segregating singular propaganda. PEACE to ALL!

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/g20143/ g20143

    Ron Paul as president would do more for black people than Obama. Libertarianism is for all people.

    Ron Paul
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8S8N2OG7sU

  • http://newsone.com/nation/casey-gane-mccalla/rand-paul-compares-himself-to-martin-luther-king-on-restaurant-smoking/ Rand Paul Compares Himself To Martin Luther King On Restaurant Smoking | News One

    [...] OPINION: Rand And Ron Paul Hide Racism In Libertarianism [...]

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/Libra_love3D/ Libra_love3D

    wow yall have thee kkk,supremisist,the tea party all racist but when black people get organizations to prtect them selves from the usual racist that always want to rule and overpower any one who they feel arent as worthy as they than we get called racist even though some whites back then and to this day were the first to form these ignorant and bias racist organizations,not to mention the ones that are kept sacret and running a mook in our country,please we have a right to protect ourselves thx,deal with it,we have to deal with yall

  • http://kissrichmond.com/national/tomjoynerradio/rand-paul-compares-himself-to-martin-luther-king-on-restaurant-smoking/ Rand Paul Compares Himself To Martin Luther King On Restaurant Smoking | KissRichmond

    [...] OPINION: Rand And Ron Paul Hide Racism In Libertarianism [...]

  • http://universalexcuses.com/rand-paul-compares-himself-to-martin-luther-king-on-restaurant-smoking Rand Paul Compares Himself To Martin Luther King On Restaurant Smoking | Entertainment News & Gossips

    [...] OPINION: Rand And Ron Paul Hide Racism In Libertarianism [...]

  • http://newsone.com/nation/casey-gane-mccalla/why-rand-paul-cant-just-say-no-to-white-supremacists/ Why Rand Paul Can’t Just Say No To White Supremacists | News One

    [...] OPINION: Rand And Ron Paul Hide Racism In Libertarianism [...]

  • http://www.blackplanet.com/spectral_ev/ spectral_ev

    Now that Ralph Nader and Ron Paul are being mentioned as the new Progressives it’s important to know who Ron Paul counts as allies.
    Libertarianism makes sense for squirrels. They all start out the same. Human beings are different. If George Bush had been named George Brush we’d never have heard of him. He’d have had to get a job.
    Human beings depend on what they inherit and what place they are assigned in society. Working to make society more just and fair is taking responsibility for doing our best in the real world.

  • http://symptomsoflowvitamind.blogspot.com/ Symptoms Of Low Vitamin D

    Symptoms Of Low Vitamin D…

    the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the…

  • http://facebookofsex.yaforia.com/ Face book of sex

    dating site careers…

    Recent Blogroll Additions………

  • http://ubinet.engr.uconn.edu/mediawiki/index.php/User_talk:Gapaizv ipad

    Here’s a view…

    Great merchandisewithin you, manWe’ve take into considerationyour current productsprevious toalong withyou are simply incredibly excellentMy partner and my spouse andIactuallyactuallyjust similar to whatyou have acquired right the following,definitely…

  • http://www.facebookofsex.adult-date.net/ facebookofsex

    dating site tweens…

    You should check this out……

  • http://www.victorianamagazine.com/archives/955 site

    singles dating…

    Most people always like to link to online sites we feel are especially excellent…

  • http://howtofightdepression.weebly.com/ acute anxiety disorder

    How To Fight Depression…

    We like to link to sites we think are especially good…

  • http://www.facebookofsex.adultcrowd.com face book of sex

    Facebook Of Sex…

    the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-Sims/100000571912142 David Sims

    Liberals, in their knee-jerk rush to smear with the racist label anyone who doesn’t agree with them have, in the case of Libertarianism, once again misapplied their usual criticism.

    Libertarianism isn’t racism. Why not? Because Libertarianism is a form of individualism, with emphasis on the economic relations between men, whereas racism is a form of collectivism with emphasis on the degree to which men share each others’ genes. However, racism isn’t, as Ayn Rand would have insisted, collectivism’s “lowest form.” It is, instead, its most natural form, a form that measures men by what men are, rather than by what men own, and therefore racism shouldn’t be “package dealed” into the same category with lower forms of collectivism, such as Marxism.

    The merit of Libertarianism is that it calls upon men to earn what they get, that it condemns robbing men who have earned in order to give other men a free ride or a handout. Libertarianism doesn’t hate the blacks; rather, it hates the bums, and it hates political systems that give the earnings of working people to the bums.

    Because most minorities (though not all of them) have lower intelligence than whites do, a higher than proportionate number of them will be unable to compete for the best jobs in a free-market economy, and therefore they will have a higher poverty rate. If they aren’t poor, there’s a good chance that they are, instead, persons for whose interests the government has decided to act as mercenary, robbing the earners to give to the bums, with the threat of fines or imprisonment for any earners who might try to evade this legalized robbery.

    Libertarians would undo that kind of institutionalized extortion. That much about Libertarianism is good. And, since the left endorses that very racket, you can understand why liberals often deliberately (and maliciously) confuse Libertarianism with racism.

    Libertarians are wrong to insist on judging the worth of men as individuals, giving short shrift to the worth of men as groups, and considering race provides insight about why.

    A summary conclusion about the nature of a race isn’t without importance. It’s vital knowledge for people who must decide where they will live, or which schools they should allow their children to attend. A white person who chooses to live among blacks, or to send his children to predominantly black schools, can’t associate only with the good ones whose behavior rises above a specified decency threshold. The net effect of their collective behavior is something that he must know in advance, for his safety.

    Summary conclusions about races are similar to measurements of temperature. Consider, for example, metal canisters filled with nitrogen gas. You can measure their temperatures in order to learn whether they are inside a safe-handling range. If you forgo testing the temperature, or if you are informed about the temperature but choose to disregard any “too hot to handle” warnings, then you risk being burned.

    But temperature does not predict the speed of any particular molecule in the canister. It only tells you what the average speed is. In other words, knowing the temperature of the gas won’t tell you the extent to which any individual molecule contributes the energy that burns your hands. But, if you pick up a hot canister, your hands will nevertheless be burned.

    Likewise, statistics on HIV infection rates, crime rates, IQ scores, and similarly important subjects, broken down by race, might tell us that a certain race is, in general, a rather nasty bunch of savages, even though we realize that there are bound to be exceptions. The existence of those exceptions does not justify or require our associating ourselves with them in such a way that we will be burned.

    I’m sure you can grasp the principle that this metaphor illustrates. The idea that morality requires anyone to treat with others only as individuals is false. Since the highest value in any proper moral system is the survival of those who practice it, any moral system that requires that other people be evaluated only as individuals, and never as groups, is improper and should not be practiced.

    Thus, Libertarianism is bad philosophy. But it isn’t racism.

blog comments powered by Disqus
?>