OPINION: None of the changes the Trump administration has made to SNAP have been for the better, and the most vulnerable have been hit the hardest.
Homeland Security's purchase has alarmed several civil rights groups given ICE’s extensive recent history of questionable use-of-force incidents.
As part of last year’s Big, Beautiful Bill, Trump made significant changes to the work requirements and funding structure for SNAP benefits.
One year after the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' critics say it widened inequality, cutting health, food, and education programs for vulnerable Americans.
The court ruled that the administration can resume carrying out speedy deportations of undocumented migrants throughout the United States. with allowing them their day in court.
A federal judge shut down a Trump admin program intended to restrict what could be purchased with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.
Earlier this month, Rep. James Comer made an appearance on One America News, where he remarked that Rep. Shontel Brown was only in office for the sole purpose of getting more welfare “for her people.”
As a result of regulations implemented in Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” an estimated 3.5 million people lost access to SNAP benefits.
A resurfaced video shows Mike Johnson defending politicians' right to use their positions to line their pockets because they don't make enough.
Restricting SNAP benefits in Alabama is not about health, but control. Structural inequities, not individual choices, drive poor outcomes.
Throughout history, SNAP work requirements have not increased employment or job stability, nor have they removed economic barriers in a meaningful way.
When your only options for grocery shopping are a corner store or a dollar store, your diet becomes much more of a survival strategy than a personal choice.