Top Ten Videos to watch

Graduates tossing caps into the air
Freddie Gray Baltimore Protests
Mid section of man in graduation gown holding diploma
Legendary Baseball Player Tony Gwynn's Family Files A Lawsuit Against Big Tobacco
ME.jailhouse#2.0117.CW Montebello City Council has approved use of a private contractor to run the n
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel Addresses Police Misconduct At Chicago City Council Meeting
WWII Soldiers Standing In A Flag Draped Sunset - SIlhouette
Students Taking a College Exam
Bill Cosby Preliminary Hearing
Hillary Clinton Campaigns In Louisville, Kentucky
Worried black businesswoman at desk
Tyler Perry And Soledad O'Brien Host Gala Honoring Bishop T.D. Jakes' 35 Years Of Ministry
Teacher with group of preschoolers sitting at table
FBI Officials Discuss Apprehension Of Explosions Suspect After Three-Day Manhunt
NFC Championship - San Francisco 49ers v Atlanta Falcons
Protests Erupt In Chicago After Video Of Police Shooting Of Teen Is Released
Nine Dead After Church Shooting In Charleston
Portrait of senior African woman holding money
President Bush Speals At Federalist Society's Gala
Police Line Tape
Senior Woman's Hands
Police officers running
New Orleans Residents Return to Housing Projects
David Banner
2010 Jazz Interlude Gala
Leave a comment

voter id laws pennsylvaniaIn one of the more high-profile cases of voter suppression ahead of the November presidential elections, a Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court judge has issued an injunction that blocks the state’s strict Voter ID law and effectively clears the way for voters to cast regular ballots without government-issued identification cards, reports the Philadelphia Inquirer.

RELATED: BREAKING: Pa. Supreme Court Returns Controversial Voter ID Law To Lower Courts For Review

Regarding the decision, Judge Robert E. Simpson wrote:

I cannot conclude the proposed changes cure the deficiency in liberal access [to ID’s] identified by the Supreme Court. I reject the underlying assertion that the offending activity is the request to produce photo ID; instead, I conclude that the salient offending conduct is voter disenfranchisement.

Watch Pennsylvania voters discuss the ruling here:

Naturally, the law’s Republican sponsor state Representative Daryl Metcalfe angrily responded with, “Justice Simpson’s final decision is out of bounds with the rule of law, constitutional checks and balances for the individual branches of state government, and most importantly, the will of the people. Metcalfe called voters who didn’t have government-issue ID cards “lazy,” regardless of the reasons why individuals weren’t able to obtain them.

The Advancement Project has been one of the leading active voices against the oppressive voter ID laws nationwide and weighed in on today’s ruling as well:

“We are very glad voters will not be turned away from the polls this November if they do have an ID,” said Advancement Project Co-Director Judith Browne Dianis. “The evidence made it clear to the judge that this law would indeed disenfranchise voters and that the Commonwealth was not equipped to implement it fairly right now.”

But not all is perfect with the ruling, added Advancement Project’s Penda D. Hair.

While we’re happy that voters in Pennsylvania will not be turned away if they do not have an ID, we are concerned that the ruling will allow election workers to ask for ID at the polls and this could cause confusion. This injunction serves as a mere Band-Aid for [the] law’s inherent problems, not an effective remedy.”

Still, this serves as a much-needed victory for Pennsylvania’s residents and the protection of their voting rights. With hope, all of the states involved with attempting to negotiate these voter ID laws will follow suit.

SEE ALSO: Is Allen West’s Campaign in Trouble?

Also On News One: