In this commentary, Dominique Morgan discusses the SCOTUS ruling in Mahmoud v. Taylor and how it erases the history and contributions of LGBTQ+ people.
In this op-ed, Preston Mitchum discusses how the SCOTUS ruling in 'Mahmoud v. Taylor' further erases and dehumanizes the queer and trans people.
The decision hides behind its interpretation that a federal court does not have the authority to issue a nationwide injunction for arguably unconstitutional actions of the Trump administration.
For Damon Landor and many other incarcerated individuals who practice minority religions, the outcome could determine whether justice is just in name or inclusive of reparations.
In many ways, the decision leaves Medicaid recipients without recourse in states with leadership fixated on defunding Planned Parenthood or otherwise instituting political litmus tests for healthcare.
The unanimous ruling lowers the legal threshold for majority-group plaintiffs in discrimination cases, reigniting debate over reverse bias, workplace fairness, and the future of DEI initiatives.
It’s a sad state of affairs when the highest court in the land appears to be working with Trump.
Many races are on the ballot in the 2024 elections, including opportunities to decide which judges will serve in state and local courts.
Even if Harris were to win in November 2024, and then win reelection in 2028, she may not have a chance to reshape the Supreme Court.
Justices will no longer enjoy the lifetime appointments, if he has his way.
The fate of scholarship money is up in the air after an increasing number of universities have put their race-conscious programs on hold.
